Search for: "Other known and unknown Defendants/Respondents" Results 121 - 140 of 403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Questions included “who the respondents thought made the t-shirt, whether the respondents thought the t-shirt makers received permission from anyone else to make the t-shirt, and whether the respondents thought the t-shirt maker produces something other than t-shirts. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:47 am by Rob Robinson
Instead of only inspecting traffic against a list of known bad payloads or behaviors, NDR also focuses on looking for unknown patterns in the network traffic, calculating a probability as to whether that anomaly is malicious. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am by Jeanne Huang
Both defendants appointed King & Wood Mallesons (‘KWM’) to respond to the Commission’s inquiries before the FCA proceeding was initiated. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 5:31 am by Jim Baker
  If the system were allowed to respond to questions or instructions that it is now prohibited from answering or complying with (or is highly restricted in how it responds or complies), and many more like it that are not too hard to imagine, the outputs might illuminate significant and previously unknown vulnerabilities that society faces from hostile actors. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:59 am by SHG
Public defenders have become the heroes of their own stories on social media, calling each other (but mostly themselves) badass, obsessed with using their time to respect the gender identity of defendants in lockup rather than use their three minutes to glean salient information to respond to the probable cause at arraignment. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Supreme Court(1) directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff maintenance of $1,438.82 per month for 36 months, (2) awarded the plaintiff sole legal and residential custody of the parties’ two children, with certain parental access to the defendant, and (3) directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff child support of $1,774.67 per month. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Obviousnesscannot be predicated on what is unknown. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schütz responded that its concerns about “rogue” or improper cross-bottling was shared in the industry. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 5:05 am by Marty Lederman
 Plaintiffs respond that their argument is not "that Davis is treating gay couples and heterosexual couples differently," but instead that marriage license applicants in Rowan County "receive distinctly different licenses than applicants in other counties in Kentucky" as a result of Davis's well-known view that "that gay couples are second-class citizens, unworthy of official recognition and authorization of their marriages. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 07682 (1st Dept., 2018) at the violation hearing, respondent admitted to sending petitioner texts after receiving the order of protection, which he said he refused to read. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 07682 (1st Dept., 2018) at the violation hearing, respondent admitted to sending petitioner texts after receiving the order of protection, which he said he refused to read. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 11:49 am by lawmrh
This is different from other jurisdictions like, for example, Nevada. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
Bharara’s and the other defendants’ motions to dismiss the lawsuit. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am by Nicholas B. Lewis
Bharara’s and the other defendants’ motions to dismiss the lawsuit. [read post]