Search for: "Owens Corning"
Results 121 - 140
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2021, 9:41 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:21 pm
, Ships (w/ID), and many others – General Motors… NARCO/Honeywell Refractory Cement-boiler products 100% Narcolite – or Staz on; Valuable but nearly impossible to pass National Gypsum Drywall Related/Some Ships/Rockwool 40% Get good “Gold Bond” affidavit for drywall/construction Owens-Corning Insulation Products 7.8% Huge Insulation Company Pacor, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 288 N.J. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
.: absolute prohibition against protection of color alone; In re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.: allowed registration of color pink for fiberglass insulation; and Master Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:44 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 638 NE 2d 1127 – Ill: Appellate Court, 5th Dist. 1994 What Happens If I Don’t Appear In Court During My Illinois Divorce? [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 4:37 am
Why is Owens-Corning fiberglass insulation pink? [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp., 84 Ohio App.3d 388, 616, N.E.2d 1162 (1992), which had held that pleural thickening or "plaques" were sufficient to constitute an injury, for purposes of stating a personal injury cause of action under Ohio law. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
Sarah Cornes, Family Law: Tying the Knot Abroad: “What does getting married abroad mean in terms of validity of the marriage? [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:10 pm
So, the answer to Louboutin’s overreaching, in my view, is not to invalidate the Louboutin red-sole trademark — as many have suggested — or discard the single-color non-traditional trademark law that has developed since the groundbreaking Owens Corning decision in 1985 and the Supreme Court’s endorsement of single-color trademarks in the 1995 Qualitex decision. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 576 N.E.2d 28, 30, 215 Ill. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 288 N.J. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 4:25 am
That’s what courts routinely said about single color marks, they’re impossible and incapable of serving a trademark purpose, until Owens Corning came along with the Pink Panther, to reverse decades of thinking against single color trademarks. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Due to a major design defect, Owens Corning was forced to file for bankruptcy in 2000 following hundreds of thousands of asbestos-related claims and billions in payouts to victims. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 12:19 am
But he was also, at some level, channelling part of the myth of The West where men were men and men did what men had to do.From James Fenimore Cooper and the Leatherstocking Tales to Owen Wister's The Virginian to Louis L'Amour's Sacketts, from Tom Mix to John Wayne to Clint Eastwood (not so much Jeff Bridges, but him too), and from Johnny Appleseed, Daniel Boone, and Davy Crockett to Ronald Reagan with stops for Crazy Horse and Chief Joseph, Geronimo and… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
WD PA: Owens-Corning postpetition asbestos claims manifested post-plan conf. were discharged via publication notice. http://bit.ly/fhs4VP Dist. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:37 pm
ASARCO supplied and sold asbestos fiber to a number of former “Fortune 500 Companies,” including Johns Manville, General Motors, and Owens Corning, as well as other Nationwide “specialized” asbestos companies, including Garlock Gaskets. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 542 A.2d 16 (N.J.App.Div. 1988), aff'd sub. nom., Mauro v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 2:25 am
Owens Corning Investment Review Committee holding that the statute begins to run when the participants are given instructions on how to access plan documents, a lower standard for “knowledge. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1050 (1995); In re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 774 F.2d 1116, 227 USPQ 417 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Owens–Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 (Anderson); O’Neil v. [read post]
