Search for: "PROVIDENT FINANCIAL, INC. V." Results 121 - 140 of 5,721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2016, 10:32 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Splash parties are entitled to a reasonable return, not the most profitable return (see id.; Matter of Westbury Laundromat, Inc. v Mammina, 62 AD3d at 891). [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:32 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Splash parties are entitled to a reasonable return, not the most profitable return (see id.; Matter of Westbury Laundromat, Inc. v Mammina, 62 AD3d at 891). [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:32 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Splash parties are entitled to a reasonable return, not the most profitable return (see id.; Matter of Westbury Laundromat, Inc. v Mammina, 62 AD3d at 891). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:03 am
A Texas federal district court judge has decided that the Minority Business Development Agency’s (MBDA) policies that provide financial assistance to minority-owned businesses are unconstitutional.1  While the court’s decision does not apply to private businesses that may encourage supplier diversity as part of a holistic inclusion, equity and diversity (IE&D) program, companies should be aware of this development as IE&D programs evolve in the wake of the… [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 1:56 pm
The factual recitation in Judge Tallman's opinion speaks for itself:"[Armond] Aria was the founder, owner, CEO, and registered agent of the now-defunct Global Financial Support, Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:15 pm
It also found that the parties were represented by sophisticated service providers and could not understand how the Buyer could conclude that financial statements reporting the past could guarantee future performance.The Court also found that the integration clause combined with the sophistication of the parties made the reliance by the Buyer of documents not part of the sale agreement (the financial statements were not included in the agreement) unreasonable.The Court,… [read post]