Search for: "People v. Singer"
Results 121 - 140
of 427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Eugene Volokh] Bakers Lose in Oregon Case, But Wedding Singers / Painters / Photographers Might Win
28 Dec 2017, 10:26 am
Today's Klein v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
[W]e do not want people to feel undignified when they walk into any place of business and do business that, you know, serves the public. . . . [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:01 pm
It’s hard to believe that it’s been over 40 years since the Lynyrd Skynyrd plane crash that took the life of lead singer and guitarist Ronnie Van Zant and five other people. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
The pop singer, Adele, who comes from a working class background, does. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:18 am
Supreme Court is set to hear the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
That’s not a trademark, absent the very unlikely establishment of the saying of that thing with any particular sayer (much less singer). [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
The caption: SINGER MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC.; LIVE GOLD OPERATIONS, INC., v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:08 am
Even if the applicant is of the 'disparaged' group of people does not negate any possible findings under the test. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
In Matal v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
Sluss v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
” He chose this moniker in order to “reclaim” and “take ownership” of stereotypes about people of Asian ethnicity. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Elliott's claim are undeniable - people do actually use the verb “to google”. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:31 pm
Matal v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
Design patent v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
The first was County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
In a scathing decision in Abdulaali v Salih, he stated, 1. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:29 am
So the Washington state Supreme Court unanimously held this morning, in State v. [read post]
