Search for: "People v Deal"
Results 121 - 140
of 11,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 6:51 am
The post Competitive Keyword Ads Go to Court: Edible Arrangements v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
(citing Jackson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm
There are many types of alternative sentencing in criminal courts that offer a somewhat better deal and sentence that going to public jail. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
" Sixteen months being a pretty long time for this particular offense, but that's the whole point of the deal. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
If D1 and D2 voluntarily engage in fighting each other, each intending to kill or cause grievous bodily harm to the other and each foreseeing that the other has the reciprocal intention, and D1 mistakenly kills V in the course of the fight, in what circumstances, if any, is D2 guilty of the offence of murdering V? [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
July 20, 2011 at 2011 WL 2892118, is the first California case that I'm aware of dealing with a class arbitration waiver in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:25 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 12:09 pm
. 'Cause three years for getting caught whacking someone ain't that bad a deal at all. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
She found the idea that people have no expectation of privacy in information they turn over to others was “ill suited to the digital age, in which people reveal a great deal of information about themselves to third parties in the course of carrying out mundane tasks. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
As were most of the participants in this botched gun sale/drug deal/whatever it was. [read post]
1 May 2008, 10:38 am
Since there are few legal restrictions on consensual sex between adults at this point, however, it is not illegal for three or more people to cohabit, even if they regard themselves as married. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:38 pm
The appellate courts are supposed to provide guidance to the lower courts and the people in their district. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
To understand what’s going on, we have to go back a few years to the marriage equality victories at the Supreme Court in 2015 in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:54 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:30 pm
And I'm sufficiently worried about convicting innocent people that this is a problem for me.Obviously one way to avoid this is simply not to let people defend themselves, and I think there's something to that -- even though there's a whole lot on the other side as well. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:33 am
I do not usually allow people to testify telephonically. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 1:58 pm
To me, it's a pretty hugely deal to formally accuse someone at trial of molesting you as a child, particularly when (if the defendant is to be believed) that the allegation is false.Especially when, as here, you're pretty sure you're going to be sentenced to death anyway, since the crime is so heinous -- and that, since it's California, the sentence probably won't be carried out in any event -- if I was a capital defendant, I could definitely see caring more deeply… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:43 pm
Sure, it's possible that a guy carrying valium is doing something illegal, since it might not be his prescription, he might illegally be dealing, he might illegally be carrying a carload of the stuff, etc. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
Ryan Johnson was a big deal. [read post]
