Search for: "People v Humphrey"
Results 121 - 140
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2021, 12:46 pm
Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Wood v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Humphrey. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
Are people frightened of me? [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Barry Friedman’s The Will of the People is a smart recent take on this theme. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
We the People simply spoke differently in this time period. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:26 am
In McCleskey v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:05 am
Under Accardi v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Humphrey, 512 U. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Although cases such as Humphrey’s Executor (1935) (upholding the constitutionality of so-called independent federal agencies) and Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
Concurrence: One of these days we should resolve what, if anything, is left of Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Hubert Humphrey (D-Minn.) described it as “about as bland as swallowing a bucket of sawdust. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
I think there’s also a decent chance the Court uses this case to overrule Humphrey’s Executor. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
Noah Feldman’s superb new book, The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President, is filled with fascinating insights relevant to contemporary American law and politics. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
The readers are left to their imagination about how the people who developed Bendectin felt about the litigation strategies and tactics of the lawsuit industry. [read post]
