Search for: "People v John Johnson" Results 121 - 140 of 635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
At the Michigan Law Review’s First Impressions, Leah Litman argues that the “petitions for original writs of habeas corpus raising questions about” the retroactivity of last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Because it seems to me when people start getting beyond Marbury v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
”); and John Steinbeck/Tom Joad: “Wherever they’s a fight so hungry people can eat, I’ll be there. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
”); and John Steinbeck/Tom Joad: “Wherever they’s a fight so hungry people can eat, I’ll be there. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
And that brings us to our last relist: Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Members of Congress sent letters to Secretary of State John Kerry and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Jeh Johnson on October 15 calling for such action. [read post]
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Akhil Amar
" He had been tipped off about the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:54 am by Jeff Gamso
  Back in 1803, the great Chief Justice John Marshall explained in Marbury v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Johnson pardoned him “for all offences…committed, arising from participation, direct or implied, in the said Rebellion. [read post]