Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:49 pm
Fewer people know that in 1994, Philips applied to register a 3D mark for the shape of its three headed razor (though Ilanah's mum claims to know this too). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
And because of the pancuronium, the person cannot indicate that the anesthesia never took or wore off.Part of the problem is that the people who are doing the killing aren't trained anesthesiologists (they screw up sometimes, too, of course). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
Help the beloved Ukrainian people on their journey towards peace, and shed the light of Easter upon the people of Russia. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
It would be fair to say that the House of Lords judgment in the joined appeals in Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKHL 36 has come as something of surprise. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
He gave two reasons for his conclusion i) It is in accordance with the true interpretation of Lord Atkin’s speech in Sim. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:27 am
The case of Street v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
O’Dell edited a book on Older People in Modern Ireland which contains various interesting essays), today’s decision is at odds with a trend towards a greater understanding of human rights and older people (although of course the House of Lords did not have that question before it). [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am
” As noted by Lord Leggatt, English courts have traditionally applied the “same interest” test rigorously, particularly in light of the Court of Appeal’s key ruling in Markt & Co v Knight Steamship [1910] 2 KB 1021. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
Supreme Court Judgment Lady Hale, with whom Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes agreed, gave the leading judgment. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
KM will see exactly the same court again, plus Lord Phillips and Lord Wilson. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:01 am
The number one term that people have searched Lord Google to find this blog, drumroll please……. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
As with Entick, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Lords Neuberger and Lord Reed disagreed. [read post]
