Search for: "People v Steven Jones" Results 121 - 140 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Stevens, No. 05-2497 Conviction for selling depictions of animal cruelty is vacated, and the statute itself, 18 U.S.C. section 48, is declared unconstitutional, where: 1) the criminalization of depictions of animal cruelty, rather than of the acts of cruelty themselves, is a content-based regulation on speech; 2) the speech in question does not constitute a new category of unprotected speech; and 3) the government has not shown that the statute is narrowly tailored, using the least… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
Eleven years later, the Court decided a case in which the reason for the racial discrimination was religious in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, 477 n.9 (Cal. 1988); Stevens v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm by Adam Feldman
Although Kennedy frequently assigned the opinions in such instances, the associate justice who most often performed that function was Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:08 am by Roy Black
No Island of Sanity: Paula Jones v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
Joe Klein, Senator Government V. [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Indeed, a far better predictor of a justice’s vote is the justice’s ideology, rather than whether a justice uses a methodology like originalism or not to decide a case (think of Scalia and Justice John Paul Stevens in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]