Search for: "People v. Ball"
Results 121 - 140
of 988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 9:09 am
I suggested that the canon should not only include super-precedents like Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
The police impersonated the drug dealer and then set up a drug deal for an eight ball of heroin. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am
How the state addresses the needs of the seriously mentally ill was the subject of Arnold v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 7:29 pm
We distinguish the authority of Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:47 am
Solomon v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
* Lantana's lament: no technical contribution, no patent Jeremy gives the floor to Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP), who recounts the tale of Lantana Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks [2014] EWCA Civ 1463, a Court of Appeal for England and Wales decision which further explored the oldie-but-goldie issue of software patentability, this time considering a data transfer method.BREAKING 'GOLDEN BALLS' NEWS: the CJEU… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:48 am
US v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:01 am
., West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
The article is titled “28 Retirement Mistakes People Make. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
The ball is in your court, gentlemen. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Knellinger v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:07 am
Ondricko v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Ball State * Another School Violated a Student’s First Amendment Rights by Disciplining Her For Facebook Posts — R.S. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Vance v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am
This decision, following on the heels of the May 21, 2013 opinion in Hart v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:58 pm
The case that raises this question is Vance v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:26 pm
Treating justices as free to express their partisan commitments may seem to explain Bush v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 7:48 pm
Ball, 141 AD2d 743 [2d Dept], lv denied 72 NY2d 954 [1988]; People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Had 20 negligent golfers hit balls into the plaintiff's backyard at the same time, which is unlikely but something I would like to see, under Summers v. [read post]
