Search for: "People v. Brown (1995)" Results 121 - 140 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:57 pm by Ronald Mann
And we do have in the common law this notion that people are held responsible for the fraud of agents. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980), the Supreme Court considered a statute that generally prohibited the picketing of residences, but exempted labor picketing. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
For example, that COVID-19 vaccines are "safe" could mean they are safe for most people who receive them, for all people, or for some group of people. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by Legal Beagle
Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr and Sir John Dyson SCJ agree with the reasons given by both Lord Hope and Lord Rodger. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:33 am by SHG
So if California didn’t want Mejia (or, if he wasn’t, in fact, released because of Brown v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]