Search for: "People v. Cheeks"
Results 121 - 140
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2013, 1:55 pm
Impact of Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
The Court’s opinion, written by Justice Kennedy, holds that the DNA testing procedure is minimally intrusive because it only requires a cheek swab, and because people detained for serious offenses have diminished expectations of privacy anyway. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 12:15 pm
A few months ago, this blog featured a discussion on Maryland v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Maryland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
There was a stone bridge and a lake with ducks and people. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this column, I considered the case of Maryland v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
Unknown: I thought Althouse's original post was a tounge on cheek [sic] reference to how we just moved on after the Supreme Court blessed us with Roe v Wade. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Today, the Supreme Court hears arguments in Marlyand v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:06 am
As a follow up to my tongue-in-cheek post last Friday about language from judicial opinions I want to mention something that's bothered me for a while now, and see if people think I'm being over-sensitive: the jocular riffing on Justice Holmes's "Three generations of imbeciles is enough" language from Buck v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 1:25 pm
Lozman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Finally, if anyone is still reading this section, I have an amusing treat: the Top Ten Funniest #Leveson Tweets, courtesy of Legal Cheek. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:59 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:28 pm
In the courts Keyu v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:14 pm
Under the Ginsberg v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:09 pm
communism, which partially underlies the Supreme Court’s grant of strong individual parental rights in Meyer v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda Sutherland… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
Suffering what most newspapers regarded as a slap in the face in terms of freedom of expression, most titles refrained from reproducing them [did they simply turn the other cheek, wonders Merpel ...]. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:12 am
“Now we are surrounded by young people,” Monsignor Sakano said. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
I certainly believe that our judiciary should reflect better the changing mores of our times and the constituent peoples of our nation. [read post]
