Search for: "People v. Phillips"
Results 121 - 140
of 825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
“Harassment” is an ordinary English word, but it can take many different forms, and most people would regard stalking as the paradigm case of harassment. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Cty. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Cty. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:23 pm
Scardina v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:56 am
The Court of Appeals upholds the law and dismisses the case.The case is Phillips v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
[Thanks to James Phillips for the lead.] [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am
There is no doubt that a great many people refuse to accept the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
It's Case T-437/09 Oyster Cosmetics SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kadabell GmbH & Co. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
In Holmes v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2020-2021update.html Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 6/28/21:Phillips, et al. v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am
What about single people? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am
Phillips v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
From June Medical Services, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
From June Medical Services, LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:18 am
Supreme Court is set to hear the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:40 am
Time Magazine asked seven historians for suggestions of people for President Trump to pardon. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
In the case at bar, the criminal court assumes the most stringent standard in People v Vilardi, that is, the “reasonable possibility” standard to apply. [read post]
