Search for: "People v. Thomas (1991)" Results 121 - 140 of 230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am by Ben
 He is being held in a high security prison in Västervik, although he recently requested a transfer to a lower safety class unit. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:48 am
In 1991, the first President George Bush nominated Clarence Thomas to replace retiring Justice Thurgood Marshall on the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:48 am
In 1991, the first President George Bush nominated Clarence Thomas to replace retiring Justice Thurgood Marshall on the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
They may also read the classic ethics case, Spaulding v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
If for Tomlins John Smith, Thomas Jefferson, and Roger Taney knew exactly what they were doing, for Johnson the antebellum master class is its own peculiar example of Hannah Arendt’s “fools of history. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]