Search for: "Peter S. Grant"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2023, 5:25 am
Peter Bishop’s Waltham [2023] ECC Por 1] [Top of section] [Top of post] Re St. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 7:17 am
Peter Glenville's 1964 film with Richard Burton as Becket and Peter O'Toole as Henry II is a classic. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:51 am
This could be good news for those who were attracted to the Court’s ability to attack European patents on a supra-national basis beyond the 9 month post-grant window of the EPO, but were afraid such challenges would inevitably invite a wider infringement battle. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 12:33 pm
Richwine sued under the First Amendment, and the court granted her a preliminary injunction, concluding that she was likely to succeed on the merits: The Order restricts Plaintiffs' speech in two ways. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Fatal Flaws in the “Abortion Pill” Decision October 23, 2023 | Peter Grossi, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School By second-guessing FDA safety determinations, the Fifth Circuit challenges the Supreme Court to restore agency deference. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Ranges’ and Oakley’s statement is, of course, demonstrably false. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:27 am
first appeared on Robichaud's Criminal Lawyers. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:27 am
first appeared on Robichaud's Criminal Lawyers. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 1:41 am
Following these two rulings, the SPC’s rationale in Oppo vs. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:40 am
First, it’s important to remember that patent rights arise from the filing of the patent application, not from the granting of the patent. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am
The court also determined that the balance of convenience favored the respondent, as granting the injunction would adversely affect students using NEMIS. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 2:45 pm
The UK patent office granted the patent. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
(That action, Peter Arnold et al. v 4-6 Bleecker Street LLC et al., has the NYSCEF Index no. 158541/2013.) [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:36 am
Brenda Joan Hollifield, Opposition No. 91247611 and Cancellation No. 92072531 (November 30, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 11:06 am
There's an interesting summary of the issues related to this practice from Magistrate Judge Peter Kang's decision last week in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
Peter Sluka recently wrote about one example he litigated to conclusion of an injunction action successfully stopping a threatened cash-out merger before its consummation due to absence of any articulated, statutorily-required “business purpose. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
While some insist that specific rules for religions are a privilege that should be granted sparingly by legislators and courts, others claim that religion and belief are part of each person’s identity and their accommodation — as much as possible — should be a priority when enacting new laws or resolving legal conflicts. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
The Hearing Officer at the UKIPO found that the use of an ANN engages the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion and refused grant (BL O/542/22). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:03 am
Peter Alexander reports for NBC News. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
.), decided July 25, in an opinion by Judge Peter Reyes, joined by Louise Dovre Bjorkman; the Minnesota Supreme Court denied review Oct. 25: Respondent Rebecca Lynn Fideldy has been employed as a legal secretary with the Itasca County Attorney's office for 16 years. [read post]
