Search for: "Picking v. STATE FINANCE CORPORATION" Results 121 - 140 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
“Does the First Amendment permit any distinction between corporate speakers and individual speakers? [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:40 am by Erin Miller
Staff picks are marked by asterisks. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
  In its coverage, the ACS Blog notes that “public financing systems like Arizona’s [are] one way to counter the enormous flow of corporate dollars into elections following…Citizens United v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
In her article, Kagan responded to the argument that campaign finance regulation is constitutionally permissible “on the ground that corporate wealth derives from privileges bestowed on corporations by the government. [read post]
They are AIG, GM, Chrysler and their two automotive-related finance companies, GMAC and Chrysler Financial, respectively. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
  But for purposes of this installment, we reference the Downie & Schudson plan because of its call for fees on ISPs as one method of financing media going forward.) [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm by Sandy Levinson
Adam Winkler offers some comments at the Daily Beast, which includes the following: "Earlier this year, the Roberts Court invalidated a campaign-finance law that banned corporations from spending shareholders’ money to influence federal elections. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
So pick your time period, pre 2002, pre 1990, whichever. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:17 am by Jay Willis
Times editorial discusses Doe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am by Adam Chandler
The Wall Street Journal examines states' responses to last Term's ruling in Caperton v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:50 am by Anna Christensen
Federal Election Commission, a high-profile campaign finance case in which the Supreme Court will decide when corporations have a free-speech right under the First Amendment to spend money as part of political campaigns. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Eric Johnston, The Japan Times, December 9, 2009 After the debate over emissions reductions targets, but very much connected to it, the question of how much it will cost to mitigate environmental disasters in the poorest countries — and how much money will be needed to help them get technology and financing to adapt to worsening weather patterns — is a key element of the Copenhagen climate talks. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Trademark registration in China (China Law Blog) Another ridiculous IPR protection awareness event (China Hearsay)   Colombia Colombia’s Senate approves accession to Madrid Protocol in second reading (Managing IP)   Europe EU member states sign agreement in principle on establishing single EU patent (Managing IP) (IAM) (Blog@IPJUR.com) (IPKat) Lisbon treaty updates EU; new commissioners named (IP Watch) Hague Agreement: you win some, you lose some –… [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:30 am
Decided on November 24, 2009 No. 178 [*1]In the Matter of Daniel Goldstein, et al., Appellants, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, d/b/a Empire State Development Corporation, Respondent. [read post]