Search for: "Power v. Holder" Results 121 - 140 of 2,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
This is presumably because the Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing (above) 503 (Finlay CJ);Doyle v Garda Commissioner [1999] 1 IR 249, [1998] 1 ILRM 229, [1997] IEHC 147 (27 August 1997); and see Warman v Fournier 2010 ONSC 2126 (CanLII) (3 May 2010)). [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:09 pm
Category: 112 - Means Plus      By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor  TitleVistan Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Holder (08-495) — challenge to banishment after felony conviction Bobby v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am by Josh Blackman
” Finally, with respect to the fourth factor, the court cited its 2010 ruling in Holder v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am by Florian Mueller
If an LNG organizes collective hold-out, the cash-flow implications for a SEP holder may be very significant or even substantial.Compared with a scenario in which neither SEP holders nor implementers would cooperate horizontally, implementers merely have an additional option in the form of a license from a pool like Avanci, while SEP holders might feel forced to settle for sub-FRAND royalty rates because of the collective market power of those engaging in… [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:06 am by Sai Vinod
Thirdly, the SEP holder is stripped off any negotiating power against its competitors. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
Further, this would leave open the lawfulness of the exclusion of office-holders who are not engaged by public bodies within the scope of the HRA. [read post]