Search for: "Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 123
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
If many of our current laws governing the transfer of property don’t matter and aren’t going to be enforced then let’s get rid of them. [read post]
