Search for: "REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2020, 6:05 am
Alex’s second post concerns The Racing Partnership Limited and Ors v Sports Information Services Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1300. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:27 am
Sometimes, we can even win—as with the passage of the Marrakesh Treaty formally known as the Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities. [read post]
25 May 2016, 7:15 am
This exchange revealed several questions on which Professors Bermann and Rau diverged – namely, arbitrability of scope issues, the concept of delegation, and whether an express remedy limitation in a contract should be treated as a limit on a tribunal’s authority. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:36 am
“Review: A Collection of Cases Overruled, Doubted, or Limited in Their Application. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
The court limited review to the following issue: Must the environmental impact report for a regional transportation plan include an analysis of the plan’s consistency with the greenhouse gas emission reduction goals reflected in Executive Order No. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:35 pm
The National Review Online took the same view. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The National Cyber Security Centre published this press release. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:29 am
That standard also applies in the limited liability company or limited partnership context where the parties adopt that standard by contract. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated, “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated, “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am
Supreme Court to Review the Application of Statute of Limitations to SEC Disgorgement Claims Posted by Brad S. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
This allegedly led to “unwarranted negative reviews of Plaintiffs’ services on popular review websites such as Yelp, Google+, Facebook, etc. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
On Sept. 24, the Federal Register published two proposed rules from the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:10 pm
The rule also amends the current joint venture provisions to clarify the conditions for creating and operating joint venture partnerships, including the effect of such partnerships on any mentor-protégé relationships. [read post]
11 May 2021, 11:48 am
The reason for the section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines § 15162 limitations is to balance CEQA’s primary purpose of promoting environmental review with interests in finality and efficiency. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
On 5 July 2023 the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) published the SEPs questionnaire for SME,small-cap and mid-cap businesses: Summary of Responses. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:53 am
In an essay entitled Law and the President that I’ve just published in the Harvard Law Review, I began by providing a brief historical and political perspective on shifting views of presidential power over the course of the 20th and 21st centuries. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: US CAFC enforces permanent injunction against Microsoft Word over XML patent: i4i Limited Partnership v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 12:48 pm
The National Center for State Courts recently published an Ignition Interlock Report reviewing the latest research on ignition interlock programs. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 3:18 pm
Today Wikileaks published a complete draft of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement’s chapter on “intellectual property rights. [read post]