Search for: "Rand v. Rand " Results 121 - 140 of 694
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2012, 8:56 am by utahpi
Judge Rules No Liability For Sending Text Messages to Driver Involved In Auto Accident Previously, we wrote about the Kubert v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 12:31 am by Caroline Ncube
However, Dombeya says it realised that even if it successfully defended the infringement claim, it would not recover its full  litigation costs which were estimated at 300 000 - 500 000 rand. [read post]
27 May 2021, 6:08 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Peretta v Rand v Technology Corporation (“Perretta”), an employer repudiated an employment contract by insisting that a new term be added after the contract had already come into effect. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:25 pm by trichard
Today, the 1st District Court of Appeal issued its unanimous decision in Ogilvie v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:41 am
But Loos says the argument over the weak rand is questionable. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:08 am by Neil Wilkof
As Lévêque and Ménière point out-- “the mainstream view is that the rationale for [F]RAND is to mitigate holdup and that the R in RAND stands for the level of royalty resulting from competition in advance of standard selection (pp. 5-6). [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
And the union did not make a showing of irreparable harm: While a recent Rand Corporation study indicated that body cameras are associated with increased assaults against police, other studies have reached different conclusions (Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:46 am by Mark Summerfield
  The bulk of the award relates to 18,073,797 consumer-grade products sold under the Linksys brand (Cisco acquired Linksys in 2003), with the remainder being for 1,471,319 Cisco enterprise products.The case, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v Cisco Systems, Inc, Case No. 6:11-cv-343 [PDF, 303kB], is interesting for a number of reasons. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court said, "We affirm the judgment of the district court with respect to the holdback claims for environmental liabilities and the Ingersoll-Rand industrial equipment. [read post]