Search for: "Render v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 18,877
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit holding that obtaining a preliminary injunction was not enough to render a plaintiff a “prevailing party. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
His Honour stated that “transparency is not an independent element of unfairness as defined in s 12BG(1)”[10] and, accordingly, must be considered within the context of the three criteria within that section. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:38 pm by Chris Sutton
Pointing to some obscure authority, the District Court found support for the proposition that Section 501(c)(3) tax exempt status is “a form of subsidy and the equivalent of a cash grant” to the school, thereby rendering CPS subject to Title IX. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:43 pm
for $1.2 million in which the County is suing the City for (1) dangerous condition of public property, (2) trespass, (3) nuisance, (4) waste, (5) indemnity and contribution, (6) removal of lateral and “subadjacent” (sic) support, (7) declaratory relief, (8) account stated, and (9) goods and services rendered. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Barry Barnett
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Matt Stoller explains U.S. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:19 am by Ronald Mann
ShareAs securities cases go, Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
These proposed rules come in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am by Unknown
” In contrast, half-truths are “representations that state the truth only so far as it goes, while omitting critical qualifying information. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:15 am by David Lynn
On Friday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann Judd… [read post]