Search for: "Richard T. Fisher"
Results 121 - 140
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
The weekend’s coverage also focused on the decision in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
The lesson for plaintiffs may be to winnow out your weakest claims before the expert-report stage so you don’t risk an appellate waiver later. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Ellis discusses the case for ACSblog, arguing that “[t]he consequences of this premature post-racial decision will likely define — negatively — the scope of voting rights for the 21st century. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm
” The EEAC needn’t have worried. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
Steven Mazie of Big Think discusses how Justice Kennedy might vote in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Other coverage comes from Thomas Merrill for this blog, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Jeremy P. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
In an op-ed for the Austin American Statesman, David Gans discusses Fisher v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
If I was going to do this, I didn’t want to write a book just for the legal community, but a book for anyone with an interest in the Court. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
” Richard Henry Dana, Jr., for the government, countered with the winning argument that war was “a state of things” and “not an act of legislative will. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Burns, A THEORY OF THE TRIAL (1999)David T. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 7:54 pm
According to Board Member Richard M. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 10:02 am
Somehow, before the Supreme Court breathed life into Federal Rule of Evidence 702, parties sometimes found a way to challenge dubious scientific evidence in court. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 4:02 pm
Fisher's lawyer as to why do you say it doesn't satisfy Grutter. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
In last week’s Fisher v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:44 am
SCOTUSblog’s symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
The following contribution to our Fisher symposium comes from Richard Thompson Ford, Professor of Law at Stanford Law School and author of Rights Gone Wrong: how law corrupts the struggle for equality. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By the way, the social-science evidence that there are compelling educational benefits that outweigh the costs is underwhelming, as discussed in the amicus briefs filed in Fisher by Abigail Thernstrom et al., Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., Gail Heriot et al., the Pacific Legal Foundation et al., (including my organization), and a group of economics and statistics scholars. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
’s SCOTUSblog post (and in two Fisher amicus briefs here and here) that race-preferential admissions simply don’t work. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:45 pm
The following contribution to our Fisher symposium comes from Stuart Taylor, Jr., a fellow at the Brookings Institution, and Richard Sander, Professor of Law at UCLA.. [read post]
