Search for: "Rogers v. May et al" Results 121 - 140 of 260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133, (June 20, 2013). [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook  318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represented Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company et al. as an amicus in support of the petitioner in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Colo. 2006), rev’d and remanded on other grounds, 618 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___ (May 24, 2012) Cotroneo v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:35 pm
A state may deny access to records available to its citizens pursuant to its Freedom of Information Law to individuals not citizens of that state who make a FOIL request for such records McBurney Et Al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm by Howard Knopf
I have previously written about how Rogers et al are trying to get a refund of their “ringtone” payments made to SOCAN going back to 2003 in light of the SCC’s July 12, 2012 decision in ESA v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Department of Defense to release graphic photos of the slain Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.In a 29-page Memorandum of Decision last year in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Knopf
Will Rogers et al get their “ring tones” tariff payments back, either via the Copyright Board or the Federal Court or both or neither? [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
First Fruits Business Ministry LLC et al. 8:12-cv-404; filed March 14, 2012 in the Central District of California • Plaintiff: TriPharma, LLC • Defendants: First Fruits Business Ministry LLC; First Fruits Beverage Co., LLC; Roger J. [read post]