Search for: "STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE."
Results 121 - 140
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
In Victor Stitt’s home state of Tennessee, the statutory requirement of “habitation” has been interpreted to include vehicles. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
The sixteen states are: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Kansas, Kentucky, which is technically a Commonwealth, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
As the Young majority acknowledges, a minority of nineteenth century cases did deny that there is right to defensive carry; these cases start with Arkansas's 1842 State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
Fortas referenced the Scopes case in the first paragraph of his opinion, noting that the Arkansas law was based on Tennessee’s “monkey law,” and that Tennessee Supreme Court eventually tossed aside the verdict reached against John Scopes in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925, in the case, which was called Scopes v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Alabama 4% Included in Sales Tax Base Yes Yes Alaska — — — — Arizona 5.60% Exempt Yes Yes Arkansas 6.50% 1.50% No No California (a) 7.25% Exempt Yes No Colorado 2.90% Exempt No No Connecticut 6.35% Exempt No No Delaware — — — &m [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
Epperson v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 5:54 am
For that reason, non compete agreements have been found to be unenforceable on those grounds in the following states: Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Mississippi, New York, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, or Tennessee, or in the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Supreme Court confirmed in Barron v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:57 am
In macabre detail, the Eighth Circuit issued a March 6, 2018 decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
Here’s a sampling: The states of Michigan, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin: The brief argues that the state “coerces political speech when it requires government employees to pay for public-sector bargaining. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
Here’s a sampling: The states of Michigan, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin: The brief argues that the state “coerces political speech when it requires government employees to pay for public-sector bargaining. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
” Huebner writes that Fortas concluded his opinion “by citing not the words of the Arkansas statute, but the Tennessee statute under which Scopes had been convicted” in the famous Scopes Trial. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Socialist Workers Party v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:03 pm
Backstrom, and James V. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” Coker v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:19 am
United States, 15-6060, the right to counsel pre-indictment case, in the morning, and United States v. [read post]
