Search for: "STATE OF CAL., ETC. v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
See the United States brief at 22-25. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
Cal. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:41 am
Wolk, 121 Cal. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
’” She noted that the United States Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 10:02 am
D058753, 2012 WL4711885 (Cal. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
United States, 264 U.S. 146 (1924). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:19 am
[T]he new couple traveled to the United States, following the execution of necessary visas and other related paperwork so that [the wife] could reside here. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
, (Cal. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:51 am
Cal.) [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Pyro is the largest fireworks production company in the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
There are, of course, many ways to address confounding in studies: stratification, multivariate analyses, multiple regression, etc. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:55 am
The recent case of United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
” More importantly, citing the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
Civil Prac & Remedies Code §22.021(2)(B)) extends protection to scholars; whilst the Californian Court of Appeals famously, in O’Grady v Superior Court 44 Cal Rptr 3d 72 (Cal Ct App 2006), interpreted the word ‘periodical’ to find that online journals were protected by state shield laws. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
Cal. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:31 am
The Court even said it was “not anxious to attribute a deliberate, intentional, and devious motive” to the Government.1 For an example of a court’s reluctance to make those findings, see United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
Ass’n, Cal. [read post]
