Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF E.D." Results 121 - 140 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors of topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
New Jersey State Parole Board, 2017 WL 1057462 (N.J. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Each case involves the reweighing of risks and benefits in light of “new information” or a “new . . . safer design. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The authors go further, however, in stating that “for most of the chronic diseases of adulthood, it is not possible for epidemiologic studies to distinguish between acceleration of disease and causation of new disease. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
It's about a hot topic - the use and abuse of medical monitoring claims in this type of case.IntroductionOn January 16, 2007, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey handed down a decision in the putative class action case, Sinclair v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the District of New Jersey may further complicate matters. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Massachusetts is one of the several states that bans stun guns (including Tasers) — the others are Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin, plus the Annapolis/Baltimore area in Maryland, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and several other cities. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
  Furthermore, even after exhausting known and potential confounders, studies of may be affected by ” residual” confounding, especially when the total array of causes of the outcome of interest is not understood. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
If anybody's interested in following the distinction between "differential diagnosis" and "differential etiology" further, see McClain v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Our holding should also be of special interest to those concerned with the evolution of surveillance by state actors or by those purporting to act at their direction. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Today that number is routine for an appeal to the high court, but in 1992, it was a signal of intense interest in the case among both the scientific and legal community. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Please contact me directly if you are interested in submitting a guest post. [read post]