Search for: "STATE v MARTINEZ"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Arteaga-Martinez, Denezpi v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Martinez Ramirez to allow Arizona to put to death two men who alleged ineffective assistance of counsel at both the trial and post-conviction stages of their journeys through the state court system. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:17 am
In 2012, the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 majority landmark decision (one hotly contested by Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia) in Martinez v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 8:58 am
From Martinez v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:53 pm
In Trevino v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:07 am
In a pair of decisions about a decade ago — Martinez v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:56 pm
Although the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Martinez v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:40 am
The question in Shinn v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:16 am
” Martinez v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am
Arteaga-Martinez and Garland v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:12 am
“The amended complaint states a cause of action for legal malpractice and the documents submitted do not utterly refute the factual allegations underlying that cause of action (see generally Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 3:03 am
But Roman Martinez, a lawyer for Mr. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 8:56 am
United States gave Miranda v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Martinez indicates through its various opinions that the Miranda violation is complete when a statement is wrongly admitted in violation of Miranda's rules; Dickerson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:26 pm
[A new filing in Vega v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:58 am
On a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the complaint a liberal construction, accept all facts as alleged in the complaint to be true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:24 am
Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
