Search for: "STATE v RAMMING" Results 121 - 140 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 4:19 am by SHG
It will almost certainly hit ramming speed when a name is actually announced. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:52 am by SHG
But § 1983 only applies to state actors. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:04 pm
Martínez-Fraga, La Doctrina de Prescripción en el Derecho Internacional Público y la necesidad de nuevos paradigmas transnacionales Consuelo Ramón Chornet, La reciente evolución de la estrategia antiterrorista, test de la estrategia global de seguridad de la UE Soledad Torrecuadrada García-Lozano, Los hijos del enemigo: las víctimas silenciosas de los crímenes sexuales María José Cervell Hortal, El ataque de… [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Hayley Evans
To that end, practices like those espoused in Pentagon policy, requiring autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons systems to undergo “rigorous hardware and software verification and validation (V&V) and realistic system developmental and operational test and evaluation (T&E),” can help reduce the risk of unintended combat engagements. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by ASAD KHAN
However, unlike the respondents and their family members, not all 75 people aboard the ram-packed boat were really refugees. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
The fishing boats swarmed around the coast guard ship and attempted to ram it. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
Rosa Amilli Guzmán Pérez, Transglobal Green Energy, LLC and Transglobal Green Panama, S.A. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm by Lisa Ouellette
Last Term, the Supreme Court called for the views of the solicitor general in Loomis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The Court thus remanded his case to the district court, where he would be allowed to prove the truth of his allegations at an evidentiary hearing.James Harold Griffith v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The Court thus remanded his case to the district court, where he would be allowed to prove the truth of his allegations at an evidentiary hearing.James Harold Griffith v. [read post]