Search for: "STATE v. BEGAY"
Results 121 - 140
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2022, 8:40 am
The case is entitled Begay v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:49 pm
The 9th (Bybee joined by Tashima and Graber) examine ACCA and these priors in light of the Supremes decision in Begay v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:39 am
Last week in Sykes v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:33 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
• Begay v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
• Begay v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
§ 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), and whether such an offense can ever be “purposeful” under that section and Begay v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
United States and Begay v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:07 am
S. 192 (2007); Begay v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:03 pm
S. 192 (2007); Begay v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Supreme Court, April 16, 2008 Begay v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
The following is a guest post from Anita Krishankumar: Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion in Sykes v. [read post]
One of the Stiffest Charges Against Jan. 6 Insurrectionists Hangs on by a Thread in the D.C. Circuit
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
The definition of “otherwise” that surfaces from Katsas’s exercise is the definition endorsed by the appellees and the Supreme Court in Begay v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:50 am
United States) do count, while “driving under the influence” (Begay v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
