Search for: "STATE v. FERNANDEZ" Results 121 - 140 of 521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Holly Fernandez Lynch & Gregory Curfman, Bosses in the Bedroom: Religious Employers and the Future of Employer-Sponsored Health Care, (Law, Religion, and Health in the United States (Holly Fernandez Lynch, I. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:29 pm by Jon Sands
Sinclair, No. 12-35363 (Fernandez with Rawlinson; dissent by Fletcher, J) --- The Ninth Circuit held that the exception to the procedural-default rule established in Martinez v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court’s imposing a “lesser disciplinary penalty” upon remand found to have usurped the authority of the arbitrator under the circumstancesFernandez v New York City Tr. [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:42 pm
  The upside is that as long as you can find a state that lets you do what you want, you're free to go -- or ship your stuff -- there.Which is also the downside. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am by Zachary C. Jackson
JacksonAt the end of January, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut issued a decision in the matter of Roth Staffing Companies, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Citing two decisions by the Supreme Court, Delaware State College v Ricks, 449 U.S. 25 and Chardon v Fernandez, 454 U.S. 6, the Second Circuit held that plaintiff's notice of termination in this case may, itself, constitute an adverse employment action notwithstanding its revocation before it became effective for the purpose of litigating an alleged unlawful discrimination or other claim.Although in this action the court found that the rescission of a… [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher
The decision, which relies heavily on two Seventh Circuit decisions, see Fernandez v. [read post]