Search for: "Safir v Safir" Results 121 - 140 of 167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the Appellate Division held that the penalty was not shockingly disproportionate to the offense "in light of the extent of [Oberman's]  misconduct, the warnings he had received against such misconduct, his failure to accept responsibility, and the high ethical standards to which he was held as an attorney. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 1:00 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
In a short per curiam opinion, the Court concluded in Snepp v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[A] penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness'" (Matter of County of Erie v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 121 AD3d 1564, 1566 [4th Dept 2014], quoting Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001]; see also Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v International Fin. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
However, in Dombrowski v Safir, decided by the Appellate Division, First Department, 269 AD2d 161, the court upheld the termination of New York City police officer Kenneth J. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:45 am
” Castro v Safir, 291 AD2d 212, is another case in which one of the issues before the court concerned the forfeiture of a retirement allowance. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:51 am
Further, the sole purpose of such a hearing is to afford the employee an opportunity to prove that the material is false and should be expunged from his or her record -- it is not grounds for reinstatement should the individual prevail.Judge Cahn ruled that Garnes was not entitled to a name-clearing hearing because even assuming all the facts in his Petition are true, he did not meet the standard for a name-clearing hearing set by the Court of Appeals in Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d… [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The penalty of dismissal is not "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The penalty of dismissal is not "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 am
In another injury at the worksite case, Crockett v Safir, 269 AD2d 227, Appellate Division, First Department, the court rejected New York City police officer Donna Crockett’s claim that she suffered a line-of-duty injury when a mirror fell and injured her while she was brushing her teeth in the ladies’ room of a police building. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
[Waldeck v NYC Employees' Retirement System, 81 N.Y.2d 804, decided with Barbaro v NYC Employees' Retirement System.]Waldeck and Barbaro challenged the forfeiture of their respective retirement benefits on the ground that they had not been advised of the effective dates of their respective discharges from employment after being found guilty of disciplinary charges filed against them.Both Waldeck and Barbaro had been terminated prior to their intended dates of voluntary… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
Creditability was also an issue in the Pelayo case [Pelayo v Safir, App. [read post]