Search for: "Scott v. Fundamental Provisions"
Results 121 - 140
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
This said, [para 81] "there has been very little consideration in any of the case law of what amounts to "reporting" a current event", although in BBC v BSB [para 82] Scott J held also news of a sporting character could fall within the scope of the defence.(3) Fair dealingIn Ashdown [one of the key cases on defences under UK law] Lord Phillips noted the impossibility of laying down "any hard-and-fast definition of what is fair dealing, for it is… [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
In fact it is so fundamentally flawed in its current form that it cannot be allowed to pass into law,” and that they will be “campaigning for mass surveillance provisions to be stripped out, and strong privacy safeguards to be introduced. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
It's no secret that this writer believes the decision to be fundamentally wrong: whilst the recordings share a very similar 'vibe' - the songs are quite different - and this case was all about the alleged copying of a song. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Data Protection and Data Privacy Leading Digital Rights and Consumer NGOs have issued a declaration, “Fundamental Rights are Fundamental” [pdf] Andrew Parker, the head of MI5, has called for a ‘mature debate’ on intercepting communications data. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
HR Consultant’s Report Not Privileged Because It Was Not Used to Provide Legal Advice At issue in the first decision, Scott v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:26 am
Which, this being the land of the free and all, was promptly denied by the court of appeals because he was obviously wrong and mandatory minimums and Fuck you.Which is where things stood for a decade or so until 2008 when SCOTUS, by an atypically split 6-3 vote, decided Begay v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:25 am
Right to Life, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Scott & W. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Scott & W. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
See Crowell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:09 pm
The Wills, Estates and Succession Act allows a will maker’s spouse or child to apply to court to vary a will if adequate provision has not been made for the spouse or child, in which case if the court finds that adequate provision has not been made, the court may make such provision as the court thinks adequate, just and equitable in the circumstances.The wills variation provisions are in Division 6, Part 4 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act, but were… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
" Still in his NYT review, AO Scott wrote that "Dr. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
In Bluman v. [read post]
