Search for: "Sean Stephens" Results 121 - 140 of 479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2016, 1:28 pm by CJLF Staff
  Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reports that the senators reached the latest total after adding 41 new names to their list, including two Iraqi refugees who were arrested last week on separate terrorism-related charges. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 7:13 pm by Howard Knopf
Ask whether this would provide any incentive for the next Glenn Gould, Leonard Cohen, Robert LePage - or, indeed, Stephen Leacock. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stefan Padfield
One, offered by Stephen Bainbridge, is that it represents a “Revolt of the Elites,” manifested at least in part by “CEOs increasingly reflect[ing] the values of the Blue state coastal bubbles in which they are embedded, especially on environmental and social issues. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:00 pm
Bilinsky, Wally Bock, Kathleen Bradley, Pawel Brodzinski, Paul Brown, Anita Bruzzese, Duncan Bucknell, Jim Bullock, BOB COFFEY, Shawn Callahan, Sean Campbell, Leading Change, James Cherkoff, Andrew Chiu, Alison Clayton-Smith, John Corr, Stuart Cross, Dan, Daniel, Mike DeWitt, John Dillard, George Dinwiddie, Dominique, Jim Donovan, Stephen Downes, Francis Egenias, Heidi Ehlers, Ron Evans, David Ewing, Brad Farris, 360 Degree Feedback, Steve Ferrara, Ken Flowers, Jordan Furlong,… [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:02 am by Jason Shinn
’s discharge of Stephens constituted unlawful discrimination because of Stephens’s transgender status, because of Stephens’s “transition from male to female,” and because of sex stereotyping. [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:02 am by Jason Shinn
’s discharge of Stephens constituted unlawful discrimination because of Stephens’s transgender status, because of Stephens’s “transition from male to female,” and because of sex stereotyping. [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:02 am by Jason Shinn
’s discharge of Stephens constituted unlawful discrimination because of Stephens’s transgender status, because of Stephens’s “transition from male to female,” and because of sex stereotyping. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:32 am by Andrew Ramonas
Partners Sean D’Arcy, Stephen Kho and James Tucker Jr., as well as consultant Janine Smith, are the other lobbyists on the account. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:09 am by Robin Shea
The EEOC claims that Amiee Stephens was a funeral director/embalmer for the defendants since 2007. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:28 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Waxman, Cyber Attacks as “Force” under UN Charter Article 2(4)Sean Watts, Low-Intensity Computer Network Attack and Self-DefenseMichael N. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 11:44 am by Daniel Margolin
  Also, visit the following link for a prior post by Sean Stephens on this issue:  http://oregondivorceblog.wordpress.com/2007/05/15/to-sell-or-not-to-sell/ [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
(l to r) Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP articling students David Solomon, Sean McDermott, Tanya DeMello, and Carey O'Connor. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 5:38 pm
Confirmed blogger-attendees so far include Harry Boadwee, the Blawg Review editor, Matt Cutts of Google (75% confirmed), Stephen Diamond, Mike Dillon of Sun, Sean Garrett of 463 Communications (trying to make it), Cathy Gellis, Eric Goldman of SCU, Joe Gratz of Keker & Van Nest, Beth Grimm, Patrick Guevara of Randick O'Dea, Matt Holohan, Chris Hoofnagle of Boalt, Cathy Kirkman of Wilson Sonsini, Kim Kralowec of the Furth firm, David Levine of Stanford Law CIS, Mike… [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:21 pm
- Philadelphia lawyer Sean Wajert of Dechert LLP in his Mass Tort Defense Blog New York's Expansive Definition of a "Franchise": Trademarks Not Required - New York attorney Charles Internicola on his New York Franchise Law Blog [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Miller] “A Convincing Case for Judicial Stays of Discovery in False Claims Act Qui Tam Litigation” [Stephen A. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:23 am
El diario neoyorquino cita al profesor de la Universidad de Nueva York Stephen Gillers, que habla de "brecha generacional" porque asegura que en el caso de un juez y un abogado que sean amigos en el mismo caso, la otra parte simplemente busca desacreditar al juez. [read post]