Search for: "Share v. Commissioner of Revenue" Results 121 - 140 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 pm by Florian Mueller
In the meantime, Twitter may become the next major app store antitrust plaintiff, which would indirectly benefit Tesla.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Dec. 1, 2003) No. 13391-01. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
This principle was reaffirmed in 2016 by the UKSC in R v (on the application of Ingenious Media Holdings) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 54 at [17]. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Euan Sinclair
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by John Hopkins
 That is one side of the argument made in Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership, et al, Petitioner vs the Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Beekman Vista, Inc vs the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Docket Nos. 2685-11, 8393-12). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
John Mander Pension Scheme Trustees Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 June 2015. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, heard 8th November 2022 R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board of England and Wales, heard 9th November 2022 News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 22nd November 2022 R (on the application of Maguire) v His… [read post]