Search for: "Shell, I. v. Shell, B."
Results 121 - 140
of 258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 4:05 pm
I would, however, reduce those amounts to $175,000 to take into account the mitigation facts. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
I am afraid that this interpretation would not be very successful, as it would then suffice to ask ISPs to log very little to make retention obligations ‘empty shells’….What does generating or processing really mean in this context [the ‘or’ in the middle is quite intriguing as processing within the meaning of the Data Protection Directive has been defined very broadly]? [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:02 pm
v=1R-B-BFQwng Frankly, the question (answer?) [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:43 am
Bern Unlimited, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:13 am
(b) . . . [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:52 pm
What do I care? [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
(b) An external focus through which the Law Society will provide facilitation of a standing forum for collaboration on access to justice by: (i) Reconstituting the Treasurer’s Advisory Group on Access to Justice as a standing forum called the Treasurer’s Action Group on Access to Justice; and (i) Providing administrative and other resources necessary to convene and support the ongoing functioning of the standing forum. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:18 am
Kearney v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
I was appalled to read the views of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Mastafa v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:51 am
Unfortunately, some of the people shaping Europe's patent policy are now pushing for a Stone Age approach that makes patent injunctions a given in any case in which an infringement is identified, more than eight years after the eBay v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:57 am
The Advocate General explains that the regulation is not an ‘empty shell’, when the provisions made by it are sufficient and the EU legislature’s competence is shared with the Member States. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
Code § 1028(a)(2) and (b)(1)(A)(ii)”, he appealed. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
Brands, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
(I’d recommend hitting up the Ritz Carlton or the Shangri-La lobby. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Shell Oil Co. (1979) 23 Cal.3d 168, 177, 151 Cal.Rptr. 671, 588 P.2d 811; Isenberg v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
‘How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
Litig., No. 3:12-CV-373-B, 2014 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 2:37 am
Litig., No. 3:12-CV-373-B, 2014 U.S. [read post]
