Search for: "Shinn v State"
Results 121 - 140
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 5:01 am
” The decision, Orlando v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:21 pm
Three D, LLC v NLRB (10-21-2015). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:16 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in EEOC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:01 am
For more information about responding to and investigating workplace allegations of sexual harassment, contact Michigan employment attorney Jason Shinn. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
See Shirrell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
The full case opinion (Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:30 pm
United States – Whitney C. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
He has enforced noncompete agreements in state and federal courts, as well as defended individuals accused of violating such agreements. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The Court disagreed, citing SCOTUS’s Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
See order in Texas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
But before jumping into the Top 10, a couple LXBN notes: Zosha writes up why the growing trend of legal representation for the unborn might be dangerous, and Young v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:41 pm
Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 7:06 am
The DOL’s revision was in response to the 2013 the Supreme Court’s decision striking down section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional (United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:18 am
(See Prewitt v Walgreens Order). [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 5:30 pm
What POM Wonderful v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:28 am
Worker’s Compensation and Retaliation In Larue v Gary P. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:56 am
By way of example, the Court cherry-picked the case of Coates v Bastian Bros, Inc, (2007). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:25 am
Specifically, in Perry v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 3:03 am
This extension is in response to the Supreme Court ruling that federal benefits cannot be limited based on a definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman, which was reached last year in United States v. [read post]
Corporations can Hold Religious Objections in order to Opt Out of covering Contraceptives for Women.
30 Jun 2014, 9:26 am
For more information and analysis about this decision, contact Michigan employment attorney Jason Shinn. [read post]
