Search for: "Simon v. Fine" Results 121 - 140 of 179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
I confess that I’m sceptical of the theory, but there are some fine articles in the collection, including: Introduction Simon Deakin and Katharina Pistor PART I LEGAL ORIGIN: CONCEPT AND CONSEQUENCES 1. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/J75MKU (Melissa Terras) Twitter Stands Up For One Of Its Users - bit.ly/J0B3fK (Aden Fine) Two New Decisions On Two Old Fronts – Part 1 – bit.ly/JoBkoL  and Part 2 - bit.ly/JwVgWw (Michael Schmidt) Understanding the Risks of BYOD and Exchange - bit.ly/IKnti7 (Nicolas [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
The final week of module one brought the Leveson Inquiry to an explosive, if temporary, conclusion. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:36 am by Sean Gallagher
A closer look While Schmitz reveled in the attention, it wasn’t long before TÜV was wondering what, exactly, it had bought. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Google has been fined US$65,000 by a Parisian court because its autocomplete function gave the French word for “crook” (“escroc”) when users searched for the name of insurance company Lyonnaise de Garantie. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
A child who has posed for a camera must go through life knowing that the recording is circulating within the mass distribution system for child pornography.13 The Court reaffirmed this truism in Ashcroft v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
The New Yorker's current issue has a fine article on Pauline Kael. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am by Charon QC
The more serious analysis from John Bolch : A few more thoughts on litigants in person “As litigants in person seems to be the subject of the moment, I thought I would return briefly to S v AG, the case I reported yesterday, to point out a couple of things mentioned by Mr Justice Mostyn, typical of cases where parties are not professionally represented. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
That was fine, of course, but was it enough to sink the trade mark application? [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” Ontario Court of Appeal Rules In Tucows v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Attorney General v Associated Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 1894 (Admin) (19 July 2011) Sun and Daily Mail get £15,000 contempt fines for publishing online picture of defendant with gun during his criminal trial. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
  It now needs to make good these fine ambitions by guaranteeing parliamentary time for the legislation. [read post]