Search for: "Smith v. Deal et al"
Results 121 - 140
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2011, 9:19 am
Maatman, Jr. and David Ross This morning the Supreme Court issued its long awaited and much anticipated ruling in Smith, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
The Court nevertheless granted the case. ** In Hall, et al., v . [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
Davey Smith, D. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:05 am
State of California, et al., U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
Consider a classic case of self-dealing. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm
Talcott, et al., “Asbestos-associated Diseases in a Cohort of Cigarette-Filter Workers,” 321 N.Engl.J.Med. 1220 (1989). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Nike, Inc. et al. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:14 am
(Al) Smith Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
In discussing how companies are using delaying tactics to stall hostile takeover bids (a subject for another day), Steven Davidoff opines: The trick is for courts to prevent this manipulation from depriving shareholders of the ultimate choice of when to sell the company. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
They are: Astra USA Inc., et al., v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
LARACH and GREAT AMERICAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:51 am
Newmark, et al., C.A. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
BIC Corporation et al. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 11:50 am
Take, for example, the chestnut case of Batsakis v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Maersk (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court S D Texas: Continuing use of accused products sold prior to notice of patent is not direct infringement sufficient to support claim of indirect infringement: Tesco v Weatherford (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Enhanced damages & attorney’s fees: Plaintiff awarded $5 million in fees, $3 million in expert expenses, and treble damages as a result of litigation misconduct by defendant: ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et… [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 6:51 am
Loo et al, 2007 BCSC 129 and Nanaimo Shipyard Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
In the honest services cases, Skilling et al., the Court saved a statute of dubious constitutionality by giving it a restrained interpretation. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Quanta Storage America, Inc. et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Quanta Storage America, Inc. et [read post]
