Search for: "Smith v. Employment Division"
Results 121 - 140
of 738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2009, 7:20 am
New York State Appellate Division, 3rd Department: Detraglia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:42 pm
Indeed, Employment Division v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
A better case might be made for overruling existing precedents, most notably Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
RFRA was a reaction to the 1990 case Employment Division v. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
An Extra Division of the Inner House (Lord MacKay of Drumadoon, Lady Dorrian and Lord McEwan) reversed the decision of Lady Smith (Doogan v Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board [2013] CSIH 36 2013 SC 496, 2013 SLT 517). [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 11:26 am
Relying on 30-year precedent set forth in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:40 am
The Court notes that the Second Circuit has never determined whether the "substantial burden" test survived the Supreme Court's ruling in Employment Division v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:01 am
Smith, 294 N.J. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton remembers David Frohnmayer, the former attorney general of Oregon who litigated Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:02 am
In Alvarado v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:32 pm
Employment Div. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Bonilla initiated an Article 78 action seeking a court order compelling the Town of Hempstead to provide him with a defense and indemnification in an action entitled Smith v Town of Hempstead, CV-134985, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York as mandated by the Town Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:31 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
The dissent by Justice Ginsburg argues that the intent of RFRA was to create a statutory remedy for burdens on religious expression that adopted the standard for evaluating First Amendment violations prior to the 1990 Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:06 pm
This case squarely presented the question whether Employment Division v. [read post]
