Search for: "Smith v. Employment Division"
Results 121 - 140
of 639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
Green, Citizenship and Solicitude: How to Overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:40 am
The Court notes that the Second Circuit has never determined whether the "substantial burden" test survived the Supreme Court's ruling in Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am
” At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton remembers David Frohnmayer, the former attorney general of Oregon who litigated Employment Division v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:01 am
Smith, 294 N.J. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:32 pm
Employment Div. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Bonilla initiated an Article 78 action seeking a court order compelling the Town of Hempstead to provide him with a defense and indemnification in an action entitled Smith v Town of Hempstead, CV-134985, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York as mandated by the Town Code. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 12:25 pm
City of Philadelphia (2021), Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch called for the reversal of Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:31 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
The dissent by Justice Ginsburg argues that the intent of RFRA was to create a statutory remedy for burdens on religious expression that adopted the standard for evaluating First Amendment violations prior to the 1990 Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 10:24 am
Here is the abstract: Since the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:45 am
This test was considered in the House of Lords in British Coal Corporation v Smith and others [1996] ICR 515. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
After Employment Division v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:55 am
Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
The believers can believe whatever they like and organize their affairs through discriminatory purposes, to be sure, but not when the government is paying and not when the public is impacted.And that is the beauty of Employment Division v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
"The Circuit Court noted that while Smith may have been fired for some other legitimate reason related to alcohol use, it would be improper to grant the County's motion for summary judgment without specific evidence that Smith was fired for such a reason.A related point involving summary termination pursuant to a disciplinary grievance settlement is clearly illustrated in ruling by the Appellate Division in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
