Search for: "Smith v. German"
Results 121 - 140
of 268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
On the same day, Warby J heard an application in the case of Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd Green J also heard an application in the case of Smith v Persons Unknown. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
’ Surveillance and Information Gathering The German cabinet has approved more stringent oversight of the country’s foreign intelligence service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND). [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
The German Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt), a German competition authority, have opened their investigation into whether or not Facebook abused their alleged dominant position in social networking by violating data protection laws. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
–Duguid v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Schofield :: SSRN https://t.co/OQCeUM80Ge -> Internet trade group endorses TPP | TheHill -> TPP is more opportunity than threat for those who embrace competition -> Top 10 tweets from CMA's CRTC Chairman Breakfast -> Trump Campaign Sued for Copyright Infringement for Using Bald Eagle Photo -> Fox News claims broadcast TV database infringes copyright -> Burrell v Clifford, Costs and Proportionality in low value privacy cases -> Microsoft's Brad Smith… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am
On TOP of this is a discount for the larger promoters of 14.5% and then an additional 20% discount or rebate available to members of the German concert promoters association BDV (Bundesverband der Veranstaltungswirtschaftand) one other trade body. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
Dame Janet Smith’s report into culture and practices at the BBC during the time that Jimmy Saville worked there was published this week. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am
The feature constituted advertising harassment, violating German laws on data protection and unfair trade practices. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
The mere conduit and injunction provisions of the ECommerce Directive, referred by a German court in Case 484/14 McFadden. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm
See, e.g., McClain v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 2:49 pm
On Class 46, Christian Tenkhoff relates German carmaker Volkswagen's latest misfortune, this being its unsurprising failure to register the word CHOICE as a Community trade mark for various goods and services. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
.* The final curtain in the GOLDBEAR sagaThe word "end" in the Haribo v Lindt golden chocolate bear litigation (see IPKat posts here, hereand here) has just been put by German Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
| Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am
THE E. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
In a decision of 26 February 2015 (published in May), the German Bundesgerichtshof addresses the extent to which innovations in user interface design are patentable. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 54 [week ending on Sunday 5 July] - Google v Oracle and Microsoft/Kyocera settlement | GC and Nagoya | Life Science IP Summit 2015 | (Kat)onomics of patents | Case T-15/13 Group Nivelles v OHIM | Case T‑521/13 Alpinestars Research Srl v OHIM v Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
