Search for: "Smith v. Grant et al" Results 121 - 140 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Conference of November 20, 2007 __________________ Docket: 06-939 Case name: Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:41 pm by Michael Erdman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, et al v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., No. 15-559 (Commil re-hash – if actions were “not objectively unreasonable&rdqu [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
Amicus brief of National Association of Legal Investigators et al. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
BILL McCOLLUM, ET AL., Respondents. ____________________________/ PETITIONER'S THIRD EMERGENCY MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION TO GET THE FACTS REGARDING DOC MEMORANDA THE PETITIONER, IAN DECO LIGHTBOURNE, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby requests that this Court grant this emergency request to relinquish jurisdiction to a neutral tribunal in the circuit court to get the facts and for full evidentiary development regarding Department of … [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:48 pm
., et al., decided on November 21, 2011, The New York Court of Appeals in a 4-3 decision granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing a construction worker's 240(1) claim. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:19 am by Beth Graham
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, et al., No. 16-712, Greene’s Energy Group filed a request for an inter partes review of two patent claims owned by Oil States Energy. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:19 am by Beth Graham
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, et al., No. 16-712, Greene’s Energy Group filed a request for an inter partes review of two patent claims owned by Oil States Energy. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al., No. 17-1229 (Supreme Court 2018), the petitioner has asked the Supreme Court to offer its statement on whether Congress altered the “on sale bar” to now apply only to non-confidential sales or offers. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:18 am by Kaitlyn E. Stone and Jennifer P. Smith
Hoboken Planning Board, et al., an unpublished decision, a developer was granted PUD approval in 1997 for a mixed use waterfront project that included residential high-rise apartment buildings, commercial retail space, a parking garage, and tennis courts. [read post]