Search for: "Spine v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2011, 6:50 am
Secretary of Health and Human Services, a claim before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for damages from a documented vaccine reaction. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by Bexis
Super. 2006), and Schindler v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
State of play When all this began in March 2010 – the same day President Obama signed the legislation, both Virginia and the Florida-led multi-state coalition filed complaints in federal court – mainstream pundits dismissed the challenges as legally frivolous, politically motivated sour grapes. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:44 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, issued an opinion on June 29, 2011, in the case styled, Cheryl Likens v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
The German and and Swiss Synthes entities have no presence in "the United States or the State of Texas. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:30 am by Gregory Dell
Nelson's lumbar spine to maintain the integrity of the lumbar vertebrae. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm by Holland & Hart
  The Tenth Circuit explained that, based on a 2009 Supreme Court decision (Penn Plaza v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:51 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The case was decided by the The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:29 am
Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 652 F.2d 306, 307 (2nd. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
United States, 752 F.2d 1538, 1551 (Fed. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, December 13, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]