Search for: "Sprinkle v. Sprinkle"
Results 121 - 140
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2014, 11:11 am
" In it I reproduced the text of a famous fictional decision from Canada's Court of Criminal Appeals, known to every law student, which goes by the name of Regina v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 3:32 pm
The venue is once again London's Waldorf Hilton Hotel, which is not 100 miles from his base in Holborn, so he may well be popping in to enjoy the ambience, say hello to his friends and pick up a little inspiration.The line-up of speakers has some familiar countenances plus a sprinkling of new faces. [read post]
4 May 2016, 9:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:23 am
Second Circuit Court of Appeals would interpret a Supreme Court decision on the issue, Herrera v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:21 pm
Franklin in the first paragraph of Franklin v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 2:08 pm
The case that every law student who studies trademark law reads is Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:22 pm
The Honorable Sandra Mazer Moss, in one of her last rulings as judge presiding over the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas mass tort program, sprinkled some cheer to dispel WOE in Jacoby v Rite Aid PCCP (Order of April 27, 2012; Opinion of April 12, 2012). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 pm
M-M-M-Mildred Loving (Loving v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm
On Tuesday, the Court ordered oral argument “in due course” — likely during the current Term — on a key aspect of the nearly four-year-old case of Montana v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:33 pm
The sobering result: the thesis was sprinkled with deliberate plagiarism. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:09 am
See Brown v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
This post summarizes the rulings on each issue and sprinkles in some of the court’s more colorful commentary. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
This post summarizes the rulings on each issue and sprinkles in some of the court’s more colorful commentary. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 1:39 pm
Sprinkled throughout are quotes, facts, anecdotes, insights and interior monologues that could only have come from particular justices — most conspicuously, O’Connor, Breyer and Kennedy — along with flattering adjectives about each. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
Riegel v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:38 pm
Wheeler and, more recently, Puerto Rico v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
In my judgment, this is no different than if this product had been sold on the Macy’s or Nordstrom’s website with Nordstrom’s and Macy’s logos sprinkled throughout. [read post]
