Search for: "State v. Pineda" Results 121 - 140 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2010, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
The Supreme Court first confronted the use of devices to monitor vehiclular movment in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by Shaun McParland Baldwin
  A rash of class action suits have been filed following a recent ruling by California Supreme Court in Pineda v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Kevin
However, invariably judges will be asked to interpret these regulations - and as a recent California court case shows, their decisions may be unsettling.In Pineda v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
OfficeMax California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Venkat Balasubramani
OfficeMax California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Hons obtained their judgment in the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, in an action captioned Hon v. [read post]