Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2009, 10:51 am
At issue in the case is whether Michigan's affirmative action ban falls afoul of the slippery equal protection doctrine of Hunter v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Superior Court, S207173. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:03 pm
Turner v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am
Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
The suit was dismissed by the Maricopa County Superior Court and the Colemans appealed. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am
’ The Court cited San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am
The State applied to, or courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:13 pm
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada (“the SCC”) has granted leave to appeal English Montreal School Board, et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
Doggett v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 11:19 pm
Superior Court (1988) 45 Cal.3d 491, in which the California Supreme Court concluded that implementation of special legislation concerning transportation facility funding in Orange was reserved exclusively to city councils and board of supervisors, not the voters. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:35 pm
Lastly, as to the Due Process claim, because the Church failed to allege that constitutionally adequate state law remedies, such as an ordinary zoning appeal of the Board’s decision to the New Hampshire Superior Court, were unavailable, the court held that the Town was entitled to summary judgment on the Church’s due process claim. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am
The Court of Appeal, following the reasoning of The Highway 68 Coalition v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
The State applied to or Courts of that State shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character or not. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
In 2009, the plaintiffs filed an action against the Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County which was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice three years later in light of the Supreme Court's decision in "Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
Supreme Court embraced in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
Court and OSC Review In coming to its conclusion, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice cited the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders (BCE) for the proposition that three conditions must be satisfied by a corporation seeking an arrangement: that statutory procedures have been met; that the application has been put forward in good faith; and that the arrangement is fair and reasonable. [read post]
