Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V. D.c., Appellant"
Results 121 - 140
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Stored Communications Act (SCA), which is part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA),[9] has been interpreted by at least two U.S. courts to forbid production of stored data of certain types only where the data are stored in the United States.[10] With respect to U.S. foreign intelligence surveillance, the rules are much more complex,[11] but unlike the Wiretap Act and the SCA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act[12] generally prohibits conduct only by persons… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm
Lewis (No. 16-285) and Ernst and Young LLP v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
The department responded that forming a database would be “a difficult task” and it has not subsequently taken steps—at least not in public—to collate sextortion statistics. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
Firm in Taxing Situation
Legal Times
An exodus of sorts is taking place at Miller & Chevalier, one that has the 100-lawyer Washington, D.C., firm taking a hard look at its future. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
¶¶ 59, 73, 91; also represented that they would receive “expedited work permits” if they took the flight;[9] represented to the Migrants that the flights would take them to Boston, Washington, D.C. or another “sanctuary state. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
After leaving her Supreme Court clerkship, she spent a year practicing law at Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, a prestigious Washington, D.C., litigation boutique that also claims as alumni former U.S. solicitor general Seth Waxman, former deputy attorney general Jamie Gorelick, and John Elwood, the head of Arnold & Porter’s appellate practice and a regular contributor to SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
CALIFORNIA WATER RIGHTS AND SUPPLY California WaterFix Extends Public Comment Period To Respond To Pandemic. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Rev. 225, 226–27 (1998), was cited by the Fourth District Appellate Court of Illinois in Illinois State Bar Ass’n Mut. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
First, as it relates to voluntariness: Ruiz marshals United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 9:00 pm
Srinivasan’s unanimous confirmation to the D.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
Under the controlling reporter's privilege case, Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:20 pm
" Under the controlling reporter's privilege case, Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
After the fire, a sample of defendant's husband's blood was sent, among other places, to the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
Kruger went from the D.C. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Upon completing her clerkship, in 1988, Kagan went to work as an associate at Williams & Connolly in Washington, D.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
And only one appellate court—during the unique circumstances of the Watergate scandal—has ever resolved the merits of such a dispute. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Reach out to your Verrill attorney before you respond to Letter 226-J. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
Along the way, he cites Cass Sunstein on the “precautionary principle,” which (per Sunstein) holds that “it is appropriate to respond aggressively to low-probability, high-impact events. [read post]
