Search for: "State of Utah, v. Smith" Results 121 - 140 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 2:23 pm
Judge Kelly is so far the only jurist in state or federal court since United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Smith relied on an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson looks at the Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:51 am by Jeff Gittins
In 1993, this practice led to the Utah Supreme Court ruling in East Jordan Irrigation Company v Morgan, commonly known as "the East Jordan Case." [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) To me, today’s decision of the United States District Court for the District of Utah in Brown v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19]  Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one deaths… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm by Bill Marler
  For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19]  Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one deaths… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
According to the civil liberties group:The government relies on a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]