Search for: "State v. Ayala" Results 121 - 140 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm by Matthew Harwood
Ayala, the United States Supreme Court decided an unrelated question on the exclusion of a defense attorney from part of a hearing on jury selection. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
Ayala, 13-1428, is a state-on-top habeas case asking whether a state court decision that constitutional error was harmless is an adjudication on the merits subject to deferential review. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Ayala 13-1428Issue: Whether a state court's rejection of a claim of federal constitutional error on the ground that any error, if one occurred, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt is an “adjudicat[ion] on the merits” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am by SHG
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am by Maureen Johnston
Ayala 13-1428Issue: Whether a state court's rejection of a claim of federal constitutional error on the ground that any error, if one occurred, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt is an “adjudicat[ion] on the merits” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Ayala, 13-1428, a state-on-top two-time relist outta the Golden State, asks whether the conclusion a claim represents harmless error is an “adjudication on the merits” under the federal habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
  According to the FMCSA, commercial trucking employers who meet those requirements do not need to comply with state meal and rest period laws because the HOS regulations preempt state law. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm by Mark Walsh
Ayala, the Court rules five to four to reverse the Ninth Circuit and hold that a trial judge’s decision to exclude a criminal defendant’s attorney from part of a Batson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm by lawmrh
Ayala-Garcia, No. 07-2129 where the prosecutor’s improper remarks “so poisoned the well that a new trial is required. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
These miserly limitations on compensation for negligence by state and local entities have rightly received a torrent of criticism lately following the Indiana State Fair stage collapse. [read post]