Search for: "State v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUDICIAL DIST."
Results 121 - 140
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2014, 4:52 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist., S213478. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
County v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist., S213478. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The fifth cause of action challenged the issuance of the streambed alteration agreement. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 5:40 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which reversed. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:09 pm
This holding conflicts with the holding and reasoning of the Third District Court of Appeal in California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
(Poet, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
The Court recognized that its decision conflicted with that of the Third District in California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
In a case notable for its unique conception of “meaningful discretion” for purposes of triggering CEQA review, the Fifth District Court of Appeal has created a split in authority that will undoubtedly require Supreme Court review (or depublication) to resolve. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
In a case notable for its unique conception of “meaningful discretion” for purposes of triggering CEQA review, the Fifth District Court of Appeal has created a split in authority that will undoubtedly require Supreme Court review (or depublication) to resolve. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
Fifth Judicial Dist. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
(The Court of Appeal, Fifth Dist., No. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
Dist. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Judicial hubris that ignores Buckman Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm
Perhaps in the future he will be equally forthcoming about his own similar mistakes.UPDATE: As commenter “Steve” points out, I was wrong to suggest in my article that the Court did not mention the Public Use Clause of the Fifth Amendment in the 1896 case of Fallbrook Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
