Search for: "State v. Dakota"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am
District Judge Jeffrey V. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court has heard a case known as Sackett v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In Troxel v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 9:25 am
North Dakota, 579 US __, 136 S. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm
One such recent case arose in South Dakota. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:12 pm
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services; Angela Lane; Jessica Humphrey; and Jennifer Clay v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:00 pm
Currently, non-compete contracts are regulated by state law: three states (California, North Dakota, and Oklahoma, as well as the District of Columbia) outright ban their enforcement, aside from a few narrow exceptions. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
In Knick v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:05 am
Ct., March 16, 2023), the North Dakota Supreme Court refused to vacate a trial court's preliminary injunction that barred enforcement of the state's 2007 abortion ban whose effectiveness was to be triggered by the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:22 pm
The North Dakota Supreme Court Thursday upheld a preliminary injunction on the state’s abortion ban while litigation on the matter proceeds. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:17 am
Article I requires that that there be two senators from every state regardless of population, which means North Dakota and California have the same power in the Senate even though California has 39 million people and North Dakota has roughly 800,000 people. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Mensch v Calogero 2023 NY Slip Op 30621(U) February 28, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155795/2022 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
” 26 civil society groups, including Privacy International and Open Rights Group signed an open letter to Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan, stating that the “ill-considered proposals…endanger UK residents and UK data protection. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Our Watch With Tim Thompson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm
He does have a co-blogger and an occasional co-author who is currently a Floridian, but what about a blogger at, say, the University of North Dakota who has exactly zero contact with Florida? [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
From the North Dakota Supreme Court's decision Friday in Arthaud v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 5:51 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:13 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm
Alabama, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Tennessee … joined the litigation as intervenor-defendants. [read post]
